Did you wake up one day and find out that another cute, cuddly animal just attempted to destroy your livelihood? Passive income websites almost exclusively depend on organic search traffic, so any traffic lost as a result of algorithm changes can do massive damage.
After months or years of exploiting a certain set of guidelines, changes to search ranking algorithms aren’t a very attractive prospect for companies that depend on the Web for the bulk of their business. I personally know of one SEO company that has lost 90% of their leads due to the latest Google changes, which will inevitably result in downsizing and layoffs. Since they were using the same tactics on their client’s sites, it’s hard to comprehend the massive backlash they’re having to address.
There is something to keep in mind about Penguin and Panda; Google didn’t down size its search engine and fire the searchers who were finding your evil, spammy site. It simply sent them elsewhere. If your site lost traffic during the last updates, that means a site that Google translates as higher quality saw an increase in web traffic. Use these tactics to improve your chances of recovering some of your lost visitors and to defend against future algorithm updates that will most likely be named after another furry, harmless mammal.
Keyword research reveals the proper distribution of anchor text
Its time to put on your Search Engineer thinking cap and figure out just what thought process is behind the Penguin update your strategy according to inbound link analysis.
Here is what we know:
- Fat head keywords make up about 15% of keyword distribution
- The chunky middle makes up anoth 10% of keyword distribution
- The long tail makes up the rest at around 70% of keyword distribution
I left out 5% as a margin of error.
And according to Google approximately 25% of search queries are absolutely unique illustrating the creativity and differences that exist from person to person. Why would a group of highly creative people, Webmasters and bloggers, suddenly become uniform in the way they construct outbound links? They wouldn’t.
Have you ever read an article by Aaron Wall. He hardly ever uses site specific keywords in his links because it doesn’t flow with what he is writing. The anchor text isn’t specific in the link I just attributed to him, just like it won’t be in most organic writing.
Algorithms are nothing more than a set of rules that are applied to data. In this case, Google’s database of Websites were reordered based on a complex set of rules from research. Their reserch centered on what a natural link profile looks like.
What are these rules? We don’t actually know and we don’t really need to know. We just need rules based on some of the same information.
- Brand name: According to Google, a higher number of people are going to link to Amazon.com and not simply ecommerce store. Linking to a site could theoretically have a very high percentage of inbound links with the brand name and not raise any eyebrows
- Fat head: Main money keywords for a site should only account for 5% – 10% of the total inbound links
- Chunky middle: less valuable keywords that still have a decent amount of traffic should only account for around 10% of your keyword distribution
- Long tail: Around 70% of inbound links
- Absolutely unique: At least 20% of inbound links (within the long tail) should be random and completely unique
We can further refine this using a the same keyword distribution chart.
Taking a “less is more” strategy to anchor text distribution will help you avoid any unfortunate encounters with a Penguin or one of it’s distant relatives in the future.
Linking is one of the most natural things that occurs on the Web. The key to getting a natural link profile is to get bloggers to link to you without actually asking them, paying them, or ever having any interaction with them at all.
These are the steps I take when link building (these actually comply with Google’s terms of service btw).
- Create the page I want to monetize
- Create a great piece of content as link bait surrounding the same idea
- Heavily promote that content through social media (this step can’t be left out, good content often outdoes great content because the promotion of the content was better)
- Promote through guest blogging
Over time as bloggers and Webmasters link to my content, the rules of link building are naturally met. I can then go out and get highly targeted links with optimized anchor text for my money page making use of the new found domain authority and PageRank of my site.
Exact match domains are the exception
Exact match domains already perform way better than simply brandable domains. The thinking by search engineers is that exact match domains are more likely to be relevant to the search query by default. Why would you build a site about baby toys on the domain name huntingknives.com. The statistical probability that the site is going to match the user’s intent is significantly higher for exact match domains.
If you are lucky enough (or rich enough 😉 ) to own an exact match domain with good traffic levels your domain just got more valuable because Google just gave you permission to do what the rest of us can’t do, link build to your site with your money anchor text the majority of the time.
Less inbound links are needed to rank for an exact match domain, and now SEO’s don’t even have to follow the rules the rest of their competition does for their money keyword phrase.
Exact match tld: its probably best to include the tld in your inbound links. For example, huntingknives.com is probably more common of a brand name link than simply “hunting knives”. This could vary from niche to niche though